Abandoned: Discontinue usage of quasar (osmo doesn't use quasar)

Proposal Discussion
1
  • insane reissuance
  • unacceptable product quality

YES: immediately discontinue usage of quasar for any osmosis protocol owned liquidity

Note: thanks to Rarma the cosmic kangaroo for dafa

1 Like
2

Hey Jacob, long time no hear.

Are our vaults perfect? no. But they are better than doing it manually, and a ton of people use them for this reason.

Even with us being out of range sometimes (which if you looked into the cost of rebalances on Osmosis, you’d come to the conclusion that in pools with low trading volume (like the stATOM / ATOM pool), rebalances often don’t make sense, especially if you optimise for not losing principal > all.

Since the last POL deployment from the Hub to Osmosis, Quasar has made the Hub as much revenue with 10% of the allocation as the other 90% did, see here: x.com

If this is political, state so. If you oppose POL deployments in general, sure, state so too then. But out of all the destinations that POL from the Hub went to, we did the best job managing it. So opposing nothing but the deployment through us frankly doesn’t make sense.

1 Like
3

Osmosis Community pool does not have any protocol owned liquidity in Quasar.

4 Likes
4

Awesome!

That’s super good to know, thanks!

1 Like