Can someone explain how giving funds back is permissible in this situation but was not in this previous situation, “ Refund dYdX user funds lost from high price impact out of ProtoRev profits ”?
Is it possible we are leaning in favor of returning funds in this case because the user has a higher value and assumably a higher net worth? I would hope that above all else, we’re not showing favoritism to this individual.
I agree that guardrails should be implemented by devs to lessen the chance of this happening in the future and I’m not against refunding the users funds, but what makes this case different from the one I referenced, or that of a $1,000 mess up? Where do we draw the line if this is passed? IMO that should be drafted and agreed upon with solid reasoning backing it before we make a decision of this magnitude.