Refund dYdX user funds lost from high price impact out of ProtoRev profits

[Winfred]

I actually would like to echo Effort capital here:

https://x.com/effortcapital/status/1741095227597660288?s=46&t=vaxn5D934yrGU4i-RMv7zg

1. So… IMO, this prop should be rejected, and it looks like it will be anyway.

2. Conversations around protocol mishaps should be had, but I do not advocate for Barry’s number 2 that somewhat dictates what conversations should be had. The Osmosis community should be the ones to guide the conversation and narrow down on a policy, if any. Barry’s #2:

@bpiv400

Create a separate signaling proposal to update protorev to atomically provide MEV rebates to swappers going forward (as a matter of policy) — if the community believes this is fair

3. The user should NOT be retro refunded. As that would still open the doors for more retro refund requests.

4. We should use this as a learning opportunity for moving forward but for this case, we should stick to the current status quo, in the words of Shapiro, “as subjectively unfair” as it may be.