A couple issues. Protorev automatically deducts 20% to pay skip. As the prop is currently worded, Skip would get paid regardless and the community alone would be paying for this user error. Shouldn’t SKIP be paying back a portion as well? If Skip is not required to pay back any funds then they are incentivized to have bad trading routes so that they get more funds and osmosis community pays back users. Not to say they would do this, but proper alignment needs to be put in place.
Also this sets bad precedent. Should every $500 that was user mistake be returned to user if that is significant portion of their portfolio?
If this passes, the protorev proposal needs to be revisited and their has to be norms established. i.e. timeframe to settle disputes such as this.