# Veto SAIL DAO Proposal-A23 **URL:** \ **Category:** SAIL\ **Created:** [July 18, 2024, 9:18am UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/veto-sail-dao-proposal-a23/2984 "2024-07-18T09:18:21Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 10\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![JohnnyWyles](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/johnnywyles/32/3114_2.png) [@JohnnyWyles](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/JohnnyWyles)\ **Post date:** [July 18, 2024, 9:18am UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/veto-sail-dao-proposal-a23/2984/1 "2024-07-18T09:18:21Z")
Proposing to use Osmosis’ veto rights on SAIL DAO to cancel [Proposal A23](https://daodao.zone/dao/osmo106tvcj58rvdn9k36m9m3xcmcwk2c3fgft3ldcst9lgy05gcmjanqexru3h/proposals/A23) This proposal sends the OSMO in SAIL DAO to a single wallet owned by the 3rd largest SAIL staker. Will load in 24 hours if the [current Osmosis Proposal](https://daodao.zone/dao/osmosis/proposals/812) looks to be failing. ![image](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/uploads/osmosis1/original/2X/2/2773f9f826f26f93e82196ee52e344069f8811b9.png) ---
**Author:** ![faddat](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/faddat/32/2098_2.png) [@faddat](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/faddat)\ **Post date:** [July 18, 2024, 9:22am UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/veto-sail-dao-proposal-a23/2984/2 "2024-07-18T09:22:29Z")
Support your veto proposal Sail: Never go full retard. A23 looks to me to be full retard. > ---
**Author:** ![Sen-Com](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/sen-com/32/724_2.png) [@Sen-Com](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/Sen-Com)\ **Post date:** [July 18, 2024, 9:41am UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/veto-sail-dao-proposal-a23/2984/3 "2024-07-18T09:41:57Z")
Agreed. This SAIL DAO proposal is not okay. ---
**Author:** ![0xFable](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/0xfable/32/2345_2.png) [@0xFable](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/0xFable)\ **Post date:** [July 18, 2024, 10:57am UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/veto-sail-dao-proposal-a23/2984/4 "2024-07-18T10:57:22Z")
I support this Veto. This is a malicious proposal. Happy that it was spotted and kudos to all involved in finding it and bringing it to attention. To me, this is a good example of why the Veto was a good thing to include in the first place. Thanks for raising this @JohnnyWyles ---
**Author:** ![0xPhilipp](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/0xphilipp/32/297_2.png) [@0xPhilipp](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/0xPhilipp)\ **Post date:** [July 18, 2024, 10:58am UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/veto-sail-dao-proposal-a23/2984/5 "2024-07-18T10:58:52Z")
Supporting that veto. On the other hand, Osmosis Foundation could just easily vote no as the major voter. ---
**Author:** ![Govmos](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/govmos/32/123_2.png) [@Govmos](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/Govmos)\ **Post date:** [July 18, 2024, 12:16pm UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/veto-sail-dao-proposal-a23/2984/6 "2024-07-18T12:16:09Z")
Not only do we support this VETO proposal but we think there should be consequences associated with this outrageous attempt. ---
**Author:** ![faddat](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/faddat/32/2098_2.png) [@faddat](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/faddat)\ **Post date:** [July 18, 2024, 3:07pm UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/veto-sail-dao-proposal-a23/2984/7 "2024-07-18T15:07:59Z")
> [@Govmos](#): > > we think there should be consequences associated with this outrageous attempt. I do not think that we should be pushing for consequences against random community members. ---
**Author:** ![LeonoorsCryptoman](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/leonoorscryptoman/32/208_2.png) [@LeonoorsCryptoman](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/LeonoorsCryptoman)\ **Post date:** [July 18, 2024, 8:22pm UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/veto-sail-dao-proposal-a23/2984/8 "2024-07-18T20:22:50Z")
Agreed on this one. I do agree that regardless of what happens with the clawback proposal, this proposal should not pass in the first place. Having $500k OSMO moving to a single-person wallet is the stupidest move ever seen and immediately proves why revisions are needed in the SAIL DAO. ---
**Author:** ![JohnnyWyles](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/johnnywyles/32/3114_2.png) [@JohnnyWyles](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/JohnnyWyles)\ **Post date:** [July 19, 2024, 9:13am UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/veto-sail-dao-proposal-a23/2984/9 "2024-07-19T09:13:41Z")
Just noting that A23 is now closed - the same actor has raised A24 to send all funds to WIND DAO (which he is also a heavy holder of) and is also impersonating @maxpower Concerned that if the veto rights were actually needed here it would dominate Osmosis governance. Going to raise a few SAIL proposals of my own - since even after a Clawback occurs the subDAO will, in theory, own about $340k of assets with a total securing stake of $26k ---
**Author:** ![maxpower](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/maxpower/32/427_2.png) [@maxpower](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/maxpower)\ **Post date:** [July 26, 2024, 10:09pm UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/veto-sail-dao-proposal-a23/2984/10 "2024-07-26T22:09:31Z")
Didn’t do a very good job of it though. Who would believe this? ![image](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/uploads/osmosis1/original/2X/4/47f18cfd69e5d997088333493accbdaa8d20b2dd.jpeg) Everyone knows I am no investor.