# Upload Transmuter Contract V1

**URL:** https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/upload-transmuter-contract-v1/133
**Category:** DApps / Tooling
**Tags:** passed
**Created:** [July 26, 2023, 7:43pm UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/upload-transmuter-contract-v1/133 "2023-07-26T19:43:08Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![LeonoorsCryptoman](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/leonoorscryptoman/32/208_2.png) [@LeonoorsCryptoman](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/LeonoorsCryptoman)
#### Post date: [July 26, 2023, 8:47pm UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/upload-transmuter-contract-v1/133/4 "2023-07-26T20:47:14Z")

</div>

Yeah, you are right on the LST assets peg switching due to different fees, different starting points when they started providing a chain and more variables.

I saw the Transmuter contracts being mentioned in the thread regarding a 2nd canonical bridge provider ([Add Wormhole as a Canonical Bridge Service Provider - #2 by LeonoorsCryptoman](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/add-wormhole-as-a-canonical-bridge-service-provider/132/2)). It might seriously have benefits there, since it might concern indeed the same asset but from different providers. We might kill a lot of discussions if the back-end can cope with the various origins while having one asset denom on the front-end.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/upload-transmuter-contract-v1/133)._