# Unwind OSMO paired liquidity pools for lower cap assets

**URL:** <https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/unwind-osmo-paired-liquidity-pools-for-lower-cap-assets/3412>\
**Category:** Proposal Discussion\
**Tags:** passed\
**Created:** [January 10, 2025, 5:04pm UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/unwind-osmo-paired-liquidity-pools-for-lower-cap-assets/3412 "2025-01-10T17:04:50Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JohnnyWyles](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/johnnywyles/32/3114_2.png) [@JohnnyWyles](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/JohnnyWyles)\
**Post date:** [January 12, 2025, 10:51am UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/unwind-osmo-paired-liquidity-pools-for-lower-cap-assets/3412/4 "2025-01-12T10:51:30Z")

</div>

I’d rather tackle any further usage of WYND and AXL in another proposal since selling those is potentially more contentious than a simple unwinding.

A WYND sale would effectively rug any remaining value from their DAO - although I think it’s inactive now anyway.

WHALE is to be returned as the original [SAIL proposal](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/sail-with-the-whale-v2-sail-dao-updated/1041) funded this from the Migaloo Foundation rather than OSMO being traded for it. While the Community pool has possession of this WHALE, it doesn’t feel like something that is ours to sell.

AXL is currently pretty close in ratio so seems like something that would add more complexity than the benefit. Using this in future to establish more Axelar bridged liquidity routes, similar to [Proposal 802](https://daodao.zone/dao/osmosis/proposals/802) is likely the better usage.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/unwind-osmo-paired-liquidity-pools-for-lower-cap-assets/3412)._