# Signaling Proposal to Verify TORI Token as a Verified Asset on Osmosis

**URL:** <https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/signaling-proposal-to-verify-tori-token-as-a-verified-asset-on-osmosis/644>\
**Category:** Proposal Discussion\
**Tags:** passed\
**Created:** [November 17, 2023, 9:09am UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/signaling-proposal-to-verify-tori-token-as-a-verified-asset-on-osmosis/644 "2023-11-17T09:09:24Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![POP.tori](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/pop.tori/32/604_2.png) [@POP.tori](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/POP.tori)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2023, 9:09am UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/signaling-proposal-to-verify-tori-token-as-a-verified-asset-on-osmosis/644/1 "2023-11-17T09:09:24Z")

</div>

Greetings Osmosis Community,  
We believe TORI’s verification on Osmosis aligns with our mutual goals of expanding and enriching the Cosmos ecosystem. Your support and feedback on this proposal would be invaluable to us.

**Voting**

- A YES vote indicates your support for removing the unverified status, enabling Teritori (TORI) to be displayed as a verified asset on the Osmosis front end.
- A NO vote signifies your preference for retaining the unverified status for Teritori (TORI), which includes continued warning labels and additional steps for token exchange.
- A NO WITH VETO vote implies that you believe this proposal could be detrimental to Osmosis, and that the proposers should be penalized, including the forfeiture of their deposit."

**Background**

Teritori, a Cosmos SDK Layer 1 blockchain and a superdApp. Our utility token, TORI, is instrumental for governance and serves as a means to access the diverse features of our superdApp, which includes:

- NFT Launchpad & Marketplace
- DAO Deployer
- Multisig Wallet
- Play-to-Earn (P2E) Games
- Onchain Social Feed

**Further Information and Links:**

- Whitepaper: [teritori whitepaper](https://teritori.gitbook.io/teritori-whitepaper/introduction/abstract)
- Website: [teritori.com](https://teritori.com)
- dApp: [app.teritori.com](https://app.teritori.com)
- Twitter: [teritori Network](https://twitter.com/TeritoriNetwork)
- Discord: [teritori](https://discord.gg/Teritori)

**Onchain Metrics:**  
90-day Active Accounts: 9,470  
Total Accounts: 55,293.

The TORI token was launched on October 3, 2022.  
$TORI has been traded on Osmosis for many months, [Osmosis Pool 816,](https://app.osmosis.zone/pool/816) and will soon be available on CEX.

–

Thank you for your consideration.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![zxxma](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/zxxma/32/606_2.png) [@zxxma](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/zxxma)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2023, 2:44pm UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/signaling-proposal-to-verify-tori-token-as-a-verified-asset-on-osmosis/644/2 "2023-11-17T14:44:01Z")

</div>

To complete the above information:  
Teritori “super-dApp” could be seen as a decentralized operating system, gathering several Web3 features, dApps and networks into a single app. (web, desktop, mobile).

As example, to understand the long term vision of the product, in the current beta version you already can go in the [dAppStore](https://app.teritori.com/dapp-store) and add Osmosis Dex swap feature in your own Teritori :  
[https://app.teritori.com/swap](https://app.teritori.com/swap)

Here you’ll find the last Q3/Q4 detailed dev report:

> **[TERITORI —  Q3 Report](https://medium.com/teritori/teritori-q3-report-8dc918bf664d)**
>
> TERITORI —  THE SUPERDAPP FOR UNSTOPPABLE ORGANIZATIONS

Here, our repo:

> **[Teritori Network](https://github.com/TERITORI)**
>
> Teritori Network has 18 repositories available. Follow their code on GitHub.

Here you’ll find Teritori OS roadmap:

> **[Teritori](https://teritori.com/roadmap)**
>
> Teritori allows organizations to communicate and interact in a resilient and transparent way.

Cheers from Paris,  
zôÖma

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![collector](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/b77776/32.png) [@collector](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/collector)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2023, 3:41pm UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/signaling-proposal-to-verify-tori-token-as-a-verified-asset-on-osmosis/644/3 "2023-11-17T15:41:10Z")

</div>

Teritori is the ibc chain that I am using most of all since it’s start. It really deserves to be verified in my opinion.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cadarn97](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/cadarn97/32/615_2.png) [@Cadarn97](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/Cadarn97)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2023, 3:45pm UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/signaling-proposal-to-verify-tori-token-as-a-verified-asset-on-osmosis/644/4 "2023-11-17T15:45:45Z")

</div>

It’s about time for $TORI to get accredited for its reliability and validity.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BlokZincir](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/blokzincir/32/621_2.png) [@BlokZincir](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/BlokZincir)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2023, 5:07pm UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/signaling-proposal-to-verify-tori-token-as-a-verified-asset-on-osmosis/644/5 "2023-11-17T17:07:00Z")

</div>

Tori is must-be network on Cosmos so Osmosis as well. Hope to see it’s to be verified soon.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Metath](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/metath/32/630_2.png) [@Metath](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/Metath)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2023, 5:20pm UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/signaling-proposal-to-verify-tori-token-as-a-verified-asset-on-osmosis/644/6 "2023-11-17T17:20:42Z")

</div>

As an early investor in TORI, I recognize the few difficulties encountered but the team is working all the harder and is listening to the community, it would be a pleasure to see TORI fully listed on osmosis, it is one of the tokens I use frequently on osmosis! A lot of ground has been covered and this is just the beginning, Tori has my full support, I can’t wait to see what the future holds !

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![redbrown](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/c2a13f/32.png) [@redbrown](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/redbrown)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2023, 5:29pm UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/signaling-proposal-to-verify-tori-token-as-a-verified-asset-on-osmosis/644/7 "2023-11-17T17:29:27Z")

</div>

It’s about time. Teritori good. Please verify sers.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![santorini](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/santorini/32/637_2.png) [@santorini](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/santorini)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2023, 9:08pm UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/signaling-proposal-to-verify-tori-token-as-a-verified-asset-on-osmosis/644/8 "2023-11-17T21:08:12Z")

</div>

Couldn’t agree more with this proposal.

- $tori has been **traded on osmosis** for a year

- Teritori team has already created several projects such as **P2E, NFT launchpad & marketplace, social feed, multisig wallet creation** and others.

- Recently Teritori dapp was added at **Keplr “Interchain Ecosystem”** section.

- Teritori was added at **Map of Zones** , based on which it has last 30D: 337,910 transactions & 4,418 IBC transfers.

- Teritori is validated by **well known validators in Cosmos ecosystem** such as:

1. Allnodes
2. Cosmostation
3. Cosmospug
4. Citadel
5. Polcachu
6. Oni
7. Frens
8. Golden Ratio staking

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nicchelas\_Wage](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/nicchelas_wage/32/639_2.png) [@Nicchelas\_Wage](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/Nicchelas_Wage)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2023, 10:02pm UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/signaling-proposal-to-verify-tori-token-as-a-verified-asset-on-osmosis/644/9 "2023-11-17T22:02:01Z")

</div>

I´m very glad to see things seriously moving forward! There´ve been some useful implementations recently that I really like. And soon, I think lots of other users from EVM and other ecosystems will like, aswell. The free tool for COSMOS chains to create Multi Sigs is very unique and is also really cool.  
Teritori has constantly delivered and if they finally can make the The R!OT Ethereum happen in the next week, they deserve to get listed as verified, as that has been the most awaited feature since, which unfortunately has constantly been delayed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tonybitcoin](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/tonybitcoin/32/641_2.png) [@tonybitcoin](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/tonybitcoin)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2023, 2:13am UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/signaling-proposal-to-verify-tori-token-as-a-verified-asset-on-osmosis/644/10 "2023-11-18T02:13:53Z")

</div>

Tori should definitely be a verified asset , been swapping since it was on frontier! Let’s get this done Osmosis !

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cryptulien](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/cryptulien/32/643_2.png) [@cryptulien](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/cryptulien)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2023, 8:03am UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/signaling-proposal-to-verify-tori-token-as-a-verified-asset-on-osmosis/644/11 "2023-11-18T08:03:00Z")

</div>

I will vote Yes! TORI is one of the best community project on Cosmos

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zadoks](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/zadoks/32/623_2.png) [@Zadoks](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/Zadoks)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2023, 10:45am UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/signaling-proposal-to-verify-tori-token-as-a-verified-asset-on-osmosis/644/12 "2023-11-19T10:45:34Z")

</div>

Tori is a great token with only growing utility. A strong team which nevertheless built a very strong marquet bear from which it was not spared. I hope that Osmosis will validate Tori for the well-being of this great project.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LeonoorsCryptoman](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/leonoorscryptoman/32/208_2.png) [@LeonoorsCryptoman](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/LeonoorsCryptoman)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2023, 6:47pm UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/signaling-proposal-to-verify-tori-token-as-a-verified-asset-on-osmosis/644/13 "2023-11-19T18:47:17Z")

</div>

I agree with listing TORI as a verified asset. It is a project which has been working on products for a while now and has shown to have the intention to stay. Getting the asset as a verified asset will make it easier for a lot of people to find the coin on the main page of Osmosis which might benefit the project as well.  
As far as I am aware there will be no cons related to this proposal in this specific case.

I don’t like all the comments from accounts which are clearly here as one-timers to support this proposal after which we will never see them here again. I would rather see a clean thread with people talking about pros and cons.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JohnnyWyles](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/johnnywyles/32/3114_2.png) [@JohnnyWyles](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/JohnnyWyles)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2023, 10:05am UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/signaling-proposal-to-verify-tori-token-as-a-verified-asset-on-osmosis/644/14 "2023-11-20T10:05:25Z")

</div>

For info, the listings team have added this form where a project can submit evidence for the verification process:

> **[ClickUp Forms](https://forms.clickup.com/37420681/f/13nzm9-24693/ZHODANFHHWP198YVAM)**

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![omniwired](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/omniwired/32/648_2.png) [@omniwired](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/omniwired)\
**Post date:** [November 22, 2023, 12:46am UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/signaling-proposal-to-verify-tori-token-as-a-verified-asset-on-osmosis/644/15 "2023-11-22T00:46:34Z")

</div>

- Legitimacy 3 X ✅
  - Brand presence: A well-designed project website or well-curated content on content platforms; e.g., a blog, Medium, YouTube, X, etc., and ✅
  - Community presence: Active community channels/following on X, Discord, Telegram, Reddit, etc., and ✅
  - Developer presence: GitHub organization with active development on open-source repository(s). ✅
    - Note: (merely forking a chain or registering a token does not qualify as ‘active development’)

[https://github.com/TERITORI/teritori-dapp/pulls](https://github.com/TERITORI/teritori-dapp/pulls)

There used to be liquidity incentives matching but not anymore.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![nostradamus](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/nostradamus/32/93_2.png) [@nostradamus](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/nostradamus)\
**Post date:** [November 28, 2023, 10:59pm UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/signaling-proposal-to-verify-tori-token-as-a-verified-asset-on-osmosis/644/16 "2023-11-28T22:59:33Z")

</div>

If the idea here is to keep token verified status props off-chain then the requirements document should be updated to not list exactly that as the first criteria for eligibility.

 ![image](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/uploads/osmosis1/original/1X/ce9c5b75da5733062584574cf4089b02085e9ab9.png)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![POP.tori](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/pop.tori/32/604_2.png) [@POP.tori](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/POP.tori)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2023, 10:24am UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/signaling-proposal-to-verify-tori-token-as-a-verified-asset-on-osmosis/644/17 "2023-11-29T10:24:11Z")

</div>

Hello Osmosis Community,

We have submitted a signaling proposal, and it is now live. We appreciate your votes and support!

> **[Mintscan](https://www.mintscan.io/osmosis/proposals/688)**
>
> Interchain explorer and analytics powered by Cosmostation.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![L1am-Stakecito](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/l1am-stakecito/32/218_2.png) [@L1am-Stakecito](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/L1am-Stakecito)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2023, 11:03am UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/signaling-proposal-to-verify-tori-token-as-a-verified-asset-on-osmosis/644/18 "2023-11-29T11:03:11Z")

</div>

Yep, this looks as though it sends a different message to proposal #528, which looks to leave maintenance of the Osmosis website in the hands of Osmosis Labs

Stakecito ABSTAINed from voting due to prop #528 and the additional governance load created from submitting a proposal when the decision should be made by Osmosis Labs via the official application route (the form Johnny has linked)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LeonoorsCryptoman](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/leonoorscryptoman/32/208_2.png) [@LeonoorsCryptoman](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/LeonoorsCryptoman)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2023, 7:14pm UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/signaling-proposal-to-verify-tori-token-as-a-verified-asset-on-osmosis/644/19 "2023-11-29T19:14:26Z")

</div>

Sharp eye @nostradamus

So according to these guidelines (I didn’t check them, stupid me) Teritori is following the exact route which is prescribed. Via governance approval it can fill the form. Changing to a “Yes” here.

@JohnnyWyles is this something which can be reviewed / revised to avoid governance overload?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JohnnyWyles](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/johnnywyles/32/3114_2.png) [@JohnnyWyles](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/JohnnyWyles)\
**Post date:** [November 30, 2023, 9:57am UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/signaling-proposal-to-verify-tori-token-as-a-verified-asset-on-osmosis/644/20 "2023-11-30T09:57:51Z")

</div>

Yes - have passed on to listings and this has been removed from the file. Proposal 528 was clear that governance doesn’t directly dictate the listing on the main frontend.
