# ProtoRev, Revisited **URL:** \ **Category:** Proposal Discussion\ **Tags:** passed\ **Created:** [December 22, 2023, 9:02pm UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/protorev-revisited/1060 "2023-12-22T21:02:05Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 41
**Author:** ![Winfred](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/winfred/32/3074_2.png) [@Winfred](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/Winfred)\ **Post date:** [January 3, 2024, 4:01am UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/protorev-revisited/1060/41 "2024-01-03T04:01:53Z")
Do we have to decide on only one use of the OSMO bit of Protorev? Coz in my head, it makes sense to have some flexibilty. For example, during a bull run, it would make sense to burn the OSMO for the narratives which could create excitement, and via feedback loops, potentially onboard tons of people to Osmosis. Post bull run it seems to me that this option: > [@JohnnyWyles](#): > > ProtoRev could be used to offset traders slippage losses - May align traders with Osmosis more, but also may have zero impact as they may just sell the OSMO. would also be awesome. Burning no longer makes sense at this stage since demand will be decreasing anyways and would undo the effects of burning. Using OSMO to reward traders then becomes a user retention strategy at a time when retention really matters. Also really love this idea: > [@Automatic Staking of Osmosis Incentive Rewards](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/automatic-staking-of-osmosis-incentive-rewards/481/1): > > This proposal would approve a change to Osmosis tokenomics during a future software upgrade that automatically stakes internal OSMO liquidity rewards to a user’s preferred validator set. --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/protorev-revisited/1060)._