# Proposal for Doubling the Max Gas Block Parameter from 120,000,000 to 240,000,000

**URL:** <https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/proposal-for-doubling-the-max-gas-block-parameter-from-120-000-000-to-240-000-000/1072>\
**Category:** Proposal Discussion\
**Tags:** revision-posted\
**Created:** [December 26, 2023, 7:29am UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/proposal-for-doubling-the-max-gas-block-parameter-from-120-000-000-to-240-000-000/1072 "2023-12-26T07:29:36Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 11

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![faddat](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/faddat/32/2098_2.png) [@faddat](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/faddat)\
**Post date:** [December 28, 2023, 11:51am UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/proposal-for-doubling-the-max-gas-block-parameter-from-120-000-000-to-240-000-000/1072/11 "2023-12-28T11:51:12Z")

</div>

I support this proposal, along with another proposal that I’m about to write that reduces block size but not as much as the one I wrote earlier, here:

> **[Mintscan](https://www.mintscan.io/osmosis/proposals/645)**
>
> Interchain explorer and analytics powered by Cosmostation.

@JohnnyWyles are you saying that currently we cannot adjust baseapp parameters? Because I would like to do well a proposal that does exactly that.

@czarcas7ic I’m in support of increasing block gas because indeed, we can put more txns in em. At the same time I would like to reduce the maximum block size to 4mb, not the 1mb I proposed earlier.

Wdyt?

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/proposal-for-doubling-the-max-gas-block-parameter-from-120-000-000-to-240-000-000/1072)._