# Osmosis Grants Program v3 Renewal

**URL:** <https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/osmosis-grants-program-v3-renewal/1003>\
**Category:** Proposal Discussion\
**Tags:** passed\
**Created:** [December 17, 2023, 5:23pm UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/osmosis-grants-program-v3-renewal/1003 "2023-12-17T17:23:29Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 7\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RoboMcGobo](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/robomcgobo/32/633_2.png) [@RoboMcGobo](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/RoboMcGobo)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2023, 2:07pm UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/osmosis-grants-program-v3-renewal/1003/41 "2023-12-29T14:07:06Z")

</div>

Ah ok I understand!

The OGP’s [one year retrospective](https://grants.osmosis.zone/blog/ogp-retro-one-year-review) is a great overview on the major accomplishments and learnings from v2.

But if you want a more detailed dive on expenses, approved grants, and updates on existing grants, etc, the OGP releases monthly and quarterly reports, which you can find at our blog here: [Latest Updates](https://grants.osmosis.zone/blog)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shoress](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/shoress/32/1654_2.png) [@Shoress](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/Shoress)\
**Post date:** [December 30, 2023, 2:48pm UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/osmosis-grants-program-v3-renewal/1003/42 "2023-12-30T14:48:05Z")

</div>

I support this proposal, I have no doubt that it will contribute more to the community in the future.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LeonoorsCryptoman](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/leonoorscryptoman/32/208_2.png) [@LeonoorsCryptoman](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/LeonoorsCryptoman)\
**Post date:** [January 1, 2024, 7:25pm UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/osmosis-grants-program-v3-renewal/1003/43 "2024-01-01T19:25:34Z")

</div>

I see a 20% cut in salary expenses indeed, might be good to include that as well, since numbers speak more in that perspective.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HsuenophonLabs](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/8baadc/32.png) [@HsuenophonLabs](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/HsuenophonLabs)\
**Post date:** [January 5, 2024, 2:58pm UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/osmosis-grants-program-v3-renewal/1003/44 "2024-01-05T14:58:18Z")

</div>

It’s hard to lose a vote when you biggest supporters are also grantees who got hundreds of thousands in grants in both osmosis and dydx. Hello cosmostation and imperator

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![POSTHUMAN](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/posthuman/32/1545_2.png) [@POSTHUMAN](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/POSTHUMAN)\
**Post date:** [January 5, 2024, 7:34pm UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/osmosis-grants-program-v3-renewal/1003/45 "2024-01-05T19:34:36Z")

</div>

Totally terrible and dangerous!

Vote No, or even No With Veto!

Save Osmosis! No Liquidity for CEXes! Vote NO on Proposal #707 in Osmosis!

[![](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/uploads/osmosis1/original/2X/c/c12532f3bc9eff52cc8f2e0ebd07b2cd81679b34.jpeg "Save Osmosis! No Liquidity for CEXes! Vote NO on Proposal #707 in Osmosis!") ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BaMx3Ii5mo)

After we will provide more OSMO on CEX, more people will deposit OSMO on CEX to trade, and CEX will be able to run validator

Even if Osmosis community pool will not directly support CEX-validators to dump OSMO, it will influence more people to trade on CEX, not on our DEXes, and it will give more possibility to CEX to run validator

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RoboMcGobo](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/robomcgobo/32/633_2.png) [@RoboMcGobo](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/RoboMcGobo)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2024, 9:40pm UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/osmosis-grants-program-v3-renewal/1003/46 "2024-01-08T21:40:48Z")

</div>

Hey everyone! A bit of an update on this proposal. Due to an issue related to the SDK 47 migration, these proposals were submitted incorrectly and have failed to execute despite passing governance.

[https://x.com/OsmosisGrants/status/1744462913463615793?s=20](https://x.com/OsmosisGrants/status/1744462913463615793?s=20)

Osmosis grants will be resubmitting both 706 and 707 shortly, and would ask that voters please vote again. Sorry for the inconvenience here. We appreciate everyone who came out to vote on the proposals thus far.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![in3s.com](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/in3s.com/32/335_2.png) [@in3s.com](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/in3s.com)\
**Post date:** [January 12, 2024, 1:56am UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/osmosis-grants-program-v3-renewal/1003/47 "2024-01-12T01:56:32Z")

</div>

The ask is for 2.2M$ but now 1.475M OSMO is worth 2.8M$, so vote “No”.

Plus, 8k for Reverie to advise?!? I’ll do it for half that.

[Previous page](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/osmosis-grants-program-v3-renewal/1003.md?page=2)
