# Implement a taker fee reduction system for active traders **URL:** \ **Category:** Proposal Discussion\ **Created:** [January 11, 2024, 4:30am UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/implement-a-taker-fee-reduction-system-for-active-traders/2158 "2024-01-11T04:30:27Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 4
**Author:** ![JohnnyWyles](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/johnnywyles/32/3114_2.png) [@JohnnyWyles](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/JohnnyWyles)\ **Post date:** [January 11, 2024, 4:58pm UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/implement-a-taker-fee-reduction-system-for-active-traders/2158/4 "2024-01-11T16:58:58Z")
Quite right, this would be the case for the staking perk implementation too… it probably is also smart contract limited so perhaps there should be a clause just to specify that this kind of activity would have a discount voided for an address, any upload rights revoked and the contract disabled (If this is possible). I can’t find the exact link now. The previous topics along those lines were: > [@Taker fee implementation - determining the details regarding height](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/taker-fee-implementation-determining-the-details-regarding-height/290): > > Based on the discussion started [on Commonwealth way back](https://commonwealth.im/osmosis/discussion/11694-taker-fee-implementation) and the upcoming implementation of the taker fee in v19 it is time to get this point of our list and take a decision. [Proposal 530](https://www.mintscan.io/osmosis/proposals/530) on chain obtained governance approval for the development and implementation of a taker fee for swaps performed on Osmosis. On top of the 0.2%-0.3% swap fee an additional taker fee of 0.15% is proposed. This would result in a fee charged for traders between 0.35% and 0.45%. This should give additional yield … and > [@Turn on Taker Fees at 0.1%](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/turn-on-taker-fees-at-0-1/373/): > > This proposal is to set the default Taker Fees at 0.1%. Previously Prop 530 passed a signaling proposal to set Taker fees at 0.15% but there were some concerns about the impact this could have on multihop transactions and potential impacts on volume. Since that time, Osmosis has moved to Supercharged Concentrated Liquidity Pools which reduced spread factor fees from 0.3% to 0.2% on many pools, mitigating some of the concerns. In a twitter poll 43% of respondents thought fees should be set at … but they don’t mention it. There was a very long argument on Telegram about taker fees that I might be mixing up with this. Glad the raising of default would be included. I’m wondering if a stake could be viewed as a rebate of taker fees in itself since they go to it. However the percentage discount is likely far lower than an actual discount perk. Something like gating by both volume and stake, E.g. Tier 1 = 100 OSMO staked OR 1k Volume in last week Tier 2 = 1000 OSMO staked OR 10k Volume in last week OR **Both** Tier 1 requirements Tier 3 = 10,000 OSMO Staked OR 100k Volume in last week OR **Both** Tier 2 requirements --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/implement-a-taker-fee-reduction-system-for-active-traders/2158)._