# FortyTwo Auto-compounder Whitelisted Address for Deployment **URL:** https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/fortytwo-auto-compounder-whitelisted-address-for-deployment/527 **Category:** DApps / Tooling **Tags:** passed **Created:** [October 30, 2023, 1:48pm UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/fortytwo-auto-compounder-whitelisted-address-for-deployment/527 "2023-10-30T13:48:51Z") **Posts on this page:** 1 **Showing post:** 4
### Author: ![LeonoorsCryptoman](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/leonoorscryptoman/32/208_2.png) [@LeonoorsCryptoman](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/LeonoorsCryptoman) #### Post date: [November 1, 2023, 7:23pm UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/fortytwo-auto-compounder-whitelisted-address-for-deployment/527/4 "2023-11-01T19:23:27Z")
Hmmm, there is a tendency to down-vote proposals with closed-source contract uploads in the past. But as soon as you upload your code will be out in the open, right? Since the code of a smart contact can be queried if I’m correct? Furthermore, how does this work in cooperation with this draft? > [@Automatic Staking of Osmosis Incentive Rewards](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/automatic-staking-of-osmosis-incentive-rewards/481/5): > > Since this would be something in a software upgrade they would have time to adjust - last time that was also a major source of complaints. However, I think this should be far less of a case because of the fee subsidy rate being so low. They will have to decide what to do with the OSMO rewards themselves, I think it could be interesting if they decided to keep the staked OSMO for the protocol itself and potentially subsidize users in return. I think they’ll likely just implement a daily unbondi… --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/fortytwo-auto-compounder-whitelisted-address-for-deployment/527)._