# Deploy $500k POL on the XPRT/OSMO pool on Osmosis jointly from the Persistence One and Osmosis Community Pools **URL:** \ **Category:** Proposal Discussion\ **Tags:** withdrawn\ **Created:** [January 19, 2024, 12:07pm UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/deploy-500k-pol-on-the-xprt-osmo-pool-on-osmosis-jointly-from-the-persistence-one-and-osmosis-community-pools/2250 "2024-01-19T12:07:08Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 3
**Author:** ![ll1ldur](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/ll1ldur/32/763_2.png) [@ll1ldur](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/ll1ldur)\ **Post date:** [January 20, 2024, 7:47am UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/deploy-500k-pol-on-the-xprt-osmo-pool-on-osmosis-jointly-from-the-persistence-one-and-osmosis-community-pools/2250/3 "2024-01-20T07:47:10Z")
To me isn’t seems excessively high, indeed it´s very cheap, if you look at 20M OSMO deployed to STRIDE protocol or the 2M ERIS protocol pretend to the same pourpose, you can obtain some perspective. Here is a quote from PHilipp: > [@Deploy 2M OSMO to the ampOSMO/OSMO Pool](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/deploy-2m-osmo-to-the-amposmo-osmo-pool/385/6): > > Protocols providing value to an ecosystem should be supported, especially if the internal cost of it is low - like providing liquidity using the CP. Of course all this moves like everything in life request time, we wiil not seeing high volumes overnigth but the cost / benefit here is paramount. PSTAKE and persistence team are working tirelessly bringing stkOSMO and instant unbonding for LP assets adding stkDYDX soon and some others so i see so much potential vs low risk and “cheap” investment , personally i migrated my ATOM and XPRT from OSMOSIS to DEXTER because OSMO no longer offer liquidity in no “strategic assets” this POL can change things and make OSMOSIS more appealing for XPRT holders and others LST´s again, agree with @aaronxkong about the state of things rigth now but that´s what they want change, to me it is worth giving a chance to this POL at least for a year. > [@pandeymikhil](#): > > What do you think of the proposed joint XPRT/OSMO POL? Worth give a chance because the upside potencial. > [@pandeymikhil](#): > > What are your thoughts on deploying liquidity on the XPRT/OSMO supercharged pool (#1101)? Are you aligned with the pool’s current parameters to host this POL? Agreed seems reasonable. > [@pandeymikhil](#): > > Who do you suggest be a part of the ⅗ multisig that will hold the POL? I have no candidates. > [@pandeymikhil](#): > > How should the POL’s LP tokens (and subsequent swap fee yield) be split? 50/50 > [@pandeymikhil](#): > > Do you believe this proposal has merits and benefits for the Osmosis Ecosystem? Oh yeah¡¡ --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/deploy-500k-pol-on-the-xprt-osmo-pool-on-osmosis-jointly-from-the-persistence-one-and-osmosis-community-pools/2250)._