# Deploy 20M OSMO to the stOSMO Pool

**URL:** <https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/deploy-20m-osmo-to-the-stosmo-pool/380>\
**Category:** Proposal Discussion\
**Tags:** passed\
**Created:** [September 22, 2023, 1:15pm UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/deploy-20m-osmo-to-the-stosmo-pool/380 "2023-09-22T13:15:47Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 30

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LeonoorsCryptoman](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/leonoorscryptoman/32/208_2.png) [@LeonoorsCryptoman](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/LeonoorsCryptoman)\
**Post date:** [October 4, 2023, 6:09pm UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/deploy-20m-osmo-to-the-stosmo-pool/380/30 "2023-10-04T18:09:51Z")

</div>

This proposal has passed; although a counter-thread has already been created:

> [@Lower amount from Prop 641 to 3M OSMO](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/lower-amount-from-prop-641-to-3m-osmo/424):
>
> Prop 641 gives 20M to a multisig to provide POL liquidity on stOsmo/Osmo. However this is way too much. There is no rationale for the need of this amount of liquidity. Absent of this rationale, the OSMO should be returned to the community pool. This is a signaling prop for the multisig in prop 641 to return 17M OSMO to the community pool. Some problems with the current proposal is that it dilutes stakers with over 6% of all staking rewards that would go towards incentivizing people from pur…

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/deploy-20m-osmo-to-the-stosmo-pool/380)._