# Daodao **URL:** \ **Category:** General\ **Created:** [July 6, 2023, 1:10am UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/daodao/58 "2023-07-06T01:10:13Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 3\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![faddat](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/faddat/32/2098_2.png) [@faddat](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/faddat)\ **Post date:** [July 6, 2023, 1:10am UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/daodao/58/1 "2023-07-06T01:10:13Z")
Earlier today I posted a whole bunch of long-winded commentary in the DAODAO governance proposal topic, And I think it might have been too long winded, so here are the stipulations that I would like to see added: - Contract code and front end code licensed to osmosis in perpetuity for the use of any osmosis project - Explanation of the role of the DAO token in the operation of DAODAO on osmosis - Information about the DAO token My long-winded post contained a lot of negatives that I believe are well worthy mention, and I wanted to make a separate second post to make clear that I do think that DAODAO is the best tooling for constructing daos in cosmos and that it perfectly can well benefit osmosis. ---
**Author:** ![LeonoorsCryptoman](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/leonoorscryptoman/32/208_2.png) [@LeonoorsCryptoman](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/LeonoorsCryptoman)\ **Post date:** [July 9, 2023, 6:31pm UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/daodao/58/2 "2023-07-09T18:31:31Z")
Would it not be beneficial to make your 2nd post in the same topic? That way people will more easily find your positive side of the reasoning 🙂 ---
**Author:** ![faddat](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/faddat/32/2098_2.png) [@faddat](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/faddat)\ **Post date:** [July 19, 2023, 3:33am UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/daodao/58/3 "2023-07-19T03:33:49Z")
I made it in a separate post so people could more easily find the positive 🙃