# Clean up CWPool Whitelist

**URL:** <https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/clean-up-cwpool-whitelist/2901>\
**Category:** Proposal Discussion\
**Tags:** passed\
**Created:** [July 5, 2024, 4:37pm UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/clean-up-cwpool-whitelist/2901 "2024-07-05T16:37:41Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 4\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JohnnyWyles](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/johnnywyles/32/3114_2.png) [@JohnnyWyles](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/JohnnyWyles)\
**Post date:** [July 5, 2024, 4:37pm UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/clean-up-cwpool-whitelist/2901/1 "2024-07-05T16:37:41Z")

</div>

This is a maintenance proposal to remove legacy CosmWasm pools from the creation whitelist.

## CosmWasm Pools

The CosmWasm pool module allows the creation and management of liquidity pools backed by CosmWasm smart contracts that are fully integrated within the main Osmosis pool structure. This allows new experimental pools types to be implemented without a software upgrade and quickly iterated upon.

## Current Whitelist

| Code ID | Pool | Usage |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 148 | Transmuter 1.0 | Used for several equivalent pools that will not be migrated |
| 254 | Transmuter 2.0 | No instances |
| 503 | WW 1.0 | No instances |
| 572 | WW 1.0.1 | No instances |
| 580 | Astroport 1.0 | 1 instance, no assets present |
| 641 | WW 1.0.2 | 10 instances - Active |
| 666 | Astroport 1.0.1 | 1 instance, no assets present |
| 773 | Astroport 1.0.2 | No instances |
| 814 | Transmuter 3.0 | 3 Instances - May be migrated in future |
| 839 | Orderbooks 1.0 | No instances |
| 842 | Astroport 1.0.3 | 12 instances - Active |
| 867 | Transmuter 3.1 | Active |
| 885 | Orderbooks 2.0 | Active |

## Proposed Changes

This proposal removes the obsolete versions of Transmuter, White Whale, Astroport and Orderbook pools to simplify the maintenance of routers and to prevent the creation of pools based on legacy codes which have since been patched.

## New Whitelist

| Code ID | Pool |
| --- | --- |
| 641 | WW 1.0.2 |
| 842 | Astroport 1.0.3 |
| 867 | Transmuter 3.1 |
| 885 | Orderbooks 2.0 |

**Target Onchain date** : 11th July 2024

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LeonoorsCryptoman](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/leonoorscryptoman/32/208_2.png) [@LeonoorsCryptoman](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/LeonoorsCryptoman)\
**Post date:** [July 5, 2024, 6:13pm UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/clean-up-cwpool-whitelist/2901/2 "2024-07-05T18:13:59Z")

</div>

Fine by me to clean up the list.

Correct me if I’m wrong; the old Astroport instance without assets are no risk at all for users? Since there are no assets involved?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JohnnyWyles](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/johnnywyles/32/3114_2.png) [@JohnnyWyles](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/JohnnyWyles)\
**Post date:** [July 5, 2024, 7:38pm UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/clean-up-cwpool-whitelist/2901/3 "2024-07-05T19:38:32Z")

</div>

Yep, have checked with the team here. Existing pools are unaffected anyway, removing from this list just stops new ones being created.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Govmos](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/govmos/32/123_2.png) [@Govmos](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/Govmos)\
**Post date:** [July 16, 2024, 7:51am UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/clean-up-cwpool-whitelist/2901/4 "2024-07-16T07:51:05Z")

</div>

We definitely support the proposition to clean this list. We would also like to remind that we should be very careful with whitelists, as they constitute potential security vulnerabilities.

[![pro-delegators-sign](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/uploads/osmosis1/original/1X/3d138289b87945115dfe59a6604e139bf36aeb94.png)](https://wallet.keplr.app/chains/cosmos-hub?modal=validator&chain=cosmoshub-4&validator_address=cosmosvaloper18sqvyf4ss84qree7gndph5chmm82fglsqfylwn)