# Add 0.01% fee CL pools to WBTC/OSMO volume splitting gauges

**URL:** <https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/add-0-01-fee-cl-pools-to-wbtc-osmo-volume-splitting-gauges/2274>\
**Category:** Proposal Discussion\
**Tags:** passed\
**Created:** [January 22, 2024, 1:07pm UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/add-0-01-fee-cl-pools-to-wbtc-osmo-volume-splitting-gauges/2274 "2024-01-22T13:07:51Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LeonoorsCryptoman](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.osmosis.zone/leonoorscryptoman/32/208_2.png) [@LeonoorsCryptoman](https://forum.osmosis.zone/u/LeonoorsCryptoman)\
**Post date:** [January 22, 2024, 6:54pm UTC](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/add-0-01-fee-cl-pools-to-wbtc-osmo-volume-splitting-gauges/2274/2 "2024-01-22T18:54:17Z")

</div>

Nice experiment, just like [the proposed lower fee pools for ATOM/OSMO](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/add-0-01-and-0-fee-cl-pools-to-the-atom-osmo-volume-splitting-gauges/2247). One question to take into account, should we do the same experiment for 2 assets at the same time? Or should we take it 1 by 1 and see what happens?

If we want to go for a 0% and a 0.01% pool for ATOM/OSMO it will yield interesting data which we can use to assess the path forwards for the rest of the pools.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/add-0-01-fee-cl-pools-to-wbtc-osmo-volume-splitting-gauges/2274)._